CARL urges presidential pardon for Palo Conteh


July 7, 2020

Unresolved grievances led to current state of insecurity in Sierra ...
CARL Executive Director, Ibrahim Tommy Esq.

While they applauded the expeditious nature of the just concluded treason trial, the Centre for Accountability and Rule of Law (CARL) has noted that they would further welcome a presidential pardon for Rtd. Major Alfred Palo Conteh or his release on bail, pending the hearing and determination of his appeal.

CARL applauds all the parties for their individual and collective contributions to ensuring a speedy conclusion of the trials. We were particularly impressed by the professionalism, brilliance and collegial spirit demonstrated by both the prosecution and defence teams: it is truly worthy of emulation. We are profoundly proud of the bravery and commitment shown by the jurors. It was an enormous task, but we appreciate their commitment to serve the people of Sierra Leone and, more important, for doing justice by the three accused persons,” a statement from CAR reads.

The right group noted that the trial reminded all and sundry that  the entire crucial role of the jury in the fair and expeditious dispensation of justice, and expressed hope that the lessons learnt from the trial will be used to make the jury trials more effective and efficient.

“We are fully aware of the significant challenges that characterize jury trials in this country, including inordinate delays caused by jury absenteeism; we believe that there are many opportunities for reforms. Rather than abolish it, the leadership of the judiciary should work cooperatively with the government and the Bar to make it more effective and responsive to the justice needs of the people of Sierra Leone.”

The release from CARL further states that the trial further offered an opportunity to remind the Government of Sierra Leone, and in particular the Ministry of Justice, of its critical role in ensuring justice for all.

“Access to justice is an important right, which is why the Government must always seek to protect the rights of all, regardless of a person’s political, economic or social status. Accordingly, those with responsibility to investigate and prosecute must do so with diligence and integrity,” it states.

CARL emphasised the serious nature of treason and called on state actors to gather sufficient evidence before they press charges against an individual.

“Treason is an extraordinarily serious offence, and we expect State actors to assess the evidence thoroughly and objectively to be certain that it meets the evidentiary threshold of sustaining the allegations. Over the last four months, the family members of Rtd. Major Conteh in particular have endured serious psychological and emotional distress. His wife was also arrested and detained for several days as part of the investigation into his alleged treason. She was released without charge, and unfortunately, without compensation or an apology.”

While they acknowledged and respect the role of the State to enforce the law and ensure accountability for crimes, the ornagisation called on those charged with delivering justice on behalf of the State to do so while bearing in mind that their decisions and actions could undermine the administration of rule of law, public confidence in state institutions, and the protection of human rights.

“We urge state officials to exercise the powers conferred on them in good faith, fairly, reasonably, and for the purpose for which they were conferred.”   

In April, Rtd. Major Conteh was arraigned on a 13-count indictment of conspiracy to commit treason or replace the government of Sierra Leone through illegal means. He was also charged with possessing a greater number of small arms than was specified in a license, and of carrying a loaded gun in a public place, contrary to the Arms and Ammunition Regulations 2014.

Two others, Retired Colonel Saa Anthony and Prince George Hughes, were charged with abetting and procuring of an offence and making a false statement under oath, contrary to the Arms and Ammunition Regulations 2014 and the Perjury Act of 1911, respectively.

The trial lasted for three months. On 1st July, 2020, a jury of seven men and five women returned a verdict of “not guilty” in respect of all the treason-related charges against Rtd. Major Conteh.

He was, however, convicted on the two lesser charges and sentenced to a term of twelve months imprisonment for each count. The sentences will be served consecutively. Messrs Sinnah and Hughes were both acquitted and discharged on all counts.

“Both parties have a right to appeal, and we sincerely hope that any appeals filed will be disposed of expeditiously in order to bring closure to these cases,” the release states.